On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 14:58 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > seth vidal (skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > > On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 14:31 -0500, Luis Villa wrote: > > > > > I agree that it would be hard to get this without splitting, and that > > > Bugzilla is cluttered enough as-is, but given the other benefits of > > > staying upstream, I'd suggest that greasemonkey or a server-side > > > 'fedora view' which hide these extra features are better ways to solve > > > this. > > > > It might be worthwhile to split if we could ensure one feature worked > > from rh-bz to fedora bz: report migration. It'd be great if fedora bz > > could have an 'add this to rh bz'. That would make interaction easier > > and, hopefully, make the transition easier for rh employees. > > > > it should be do-able, I think. > > I don't see why this would require a split, though. > b/c as it is, the process to change and get new features into rh's bugzilla is slow and laborious, at least afaict. -sv _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
