John Poelstra (poelstra@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > Okay, maybe that is too "corporate speak" :) > > Up until now the rationale I've seen has mostly been "we should do this > because Fedora should do all of its own stuff" or "if we had a separate > instance everything would be better". So far I haven't found any of these > arguments to be compelling enough in the face of the disruption it would > cause to Fedora and Red Hat. > > Would we be creating more new problems than we are solving? Benefits: - ease of incorporating new upstream versions - with those versions, easier to move bugs and link them to other upstream bug trackers - able to wipe out old bugs - removal of various non-upstream 'features' that RH uses that Fedora doesn't need Demerits: - RH developers no longer have one-stop shopping - would need RH changes to support moving bugs to RH bugzilla - would need to run our own instance - would wipe out old bugs That's my 10-second view. Bill _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
