On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 02:48:43PM -0500, seth vidal wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 14:31 -0500, Luis Villa wrote: > > > I agree that it would be hard to get this without splitting, and that > > Bugzilla is cluttered enough as-is, but given the other benefits of > > staying upstream, I'd suggest that greasemonkey or a server-side > > 'fedora view' which hide these extra features are better ways to solve > > this. > > > > It might be worthwhile to split if we could ensure one feature worked > from rh-bz to fedora bz: report migration. It'd be great if fedora bz > could have an 'add this to rh bz'. That would make interaction easier > and, hopefully, make the transition easier for rh employees. 'add this to rh bz for product version $foo' would be even nicer. I routinely have to dupe bugs several times, once for each affected RHEL version, and once for each other impacted product. Not that I like Launchpad being proprietary (and that's clearly a showstopper here), but it has this concept of integrating with other bug trackers in this manner (and keeping track that you did so), which is very convenient. _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
