On Jan 3, 2008 8:35 AM, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>>> "RS" == Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > RS> The fact that bugz.fp.o is separate instead of being part of > > RS> bugzilla to me, indicates that we have a problem. > > > > I'm having trouble understanding how a quick interface to a few set > > queries is a problem. Surely it's a good thing that bugzilla lets us > > do this. > > Enhancements like this should be part of bugzilla and not a separate > interface. http://bugzilla.redhat.com/rpm can be modified to do this. > The reason why we don't it is because pretty much nobody in Fedora has > access to that bugzilla instance to make improvements that benefit Fedora. > Uhm only if the changes don't break the accounting and other legal processes that might be in Bugzilla because of SOX legal requirements and such. You cant just hack around with bugzilla.redhat.com as it is part of the company that makes money to pay for the rest of the toys. > Rahul > > > _______________________________________________ > fedora-advisory-board mailing list > fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board > -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice" _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
