On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 15:30 +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: > seth vidal wrote: > > 3 years is a long time for keeping the sources around if we generate > > them that way. It seems like we're better off in terms of space and in > > terms of being able to provide sources for the longer run if we can > > generate srpms on the fly out of cvs. > > > > However once you choose to generate srpms on the fly out of cvs, you are > also committing to using cvs for the same amount of time. Migrating the > cvs component to anything else might show to have a huge tail and might > just not work in the sense that the new vcs might not give you srpms > with the same checksum, or <insert-favorite-unforeseen-hurdle-here>. > No we aren't committing to using cvs. We're committing to the tool which generates the srpms being able to talk to whatever we're using in the future. -sv _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
