Re: Legal update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rahul Sundaram (sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> I had the impression that it was about linking to the repository package 
> directly instead of just the website? If even linking to the website itself 
> from a dialog box in codeina is not ok with Red Hat Legal,

It's not. What part of 'you may not link to the repository in the software'
is hard to understand?

> update http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CodecBuddy or in the second dialog 
> where it lists the Fluendo codecs, we could introduce a new link that says 
> "click here for free alternatives" or something similar. Is that ok?

Again, that second dialog is in the software itself, populated from the
XML file.

Bill

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux