On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 09:37 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 09:31 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > > The semantics of the how are not really my call, as long as you follow > > these two rules: > > > > 1. The only place we can link to 3rd party repositories is from > > fedoraproject.org, under the terms that I originally described. > > > > 2. We cannot directly link to 3rd party repositories from any Fedora > > package. > > > > If codeina used a file housed on fp.o that talked about livna and > fluendo, etc, would that be acceptable? > > essentially, if we modified codeina to get this file: > /usr/share/codeina/xml/available-plugins.xml > > from our website. Or referred to our site from that file, even. > > that sounds like it is within the rules. If we link to the fedoraproject.org page, rather than include it in the package, it is fine. To be crystal clear: Thou shalt not mention 3rd party repositories inside any file which lives in a Fedora package. Codeina could say "look at this URL for other options", and point to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ThirdPartyRepositories I'm pretty sure we cannot offer up a .xml file which configures livna like you're describing. ~spot _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
