Re: 3 development process improvements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Max Spevack wrote:
It is very rare that Fedora developers actually talk to each other on the phone (as opposed to IRC), but jkeating, mmcgrath, and I were just having a quick chat.

Three general points that I jotted down for further email discussion:

(1) pick a release name sooner in the cycle so that artwork, marketing materials, and web content can be finished sooner.

I've mentioned this before for to a few people.  Completely agree here.


(3) more dedicated feature QA/smoke-testing. Ask feature owners, as we get to the pre-release time, to do a fresh install and sanity check their feature to make sure it looks and operates the way it should.

I really wish that we had more of a dedicated/organized QA effort for Fedora. Smoketesting is a great first step. I really hope that we can make some headway with this, because it was a very successful way to draw in contributors to Mozilla back in the day (and still is).

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux