On 8/28/07, Dennis Gilmore <dennis@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > also your links to fedora are wrong they should be fedoraproject.org not > fedora.redhat.com minor detail but fedora.redhat.com is dead. Whoops, easy enough to fix. > Any Fedora Infrastructure type thing (which this is) has a few rules. It > needs to be completely open. i.e somebody else needs to be able to deploy > it themselves using whats provided in Fedora. (* We allow exceptions at > times for things in review) all components need to be free and open source. > We Just got the whole OS on a free and open platform. We can not change this > now. So your JSP stuff had better work with gcj. the servers need to be > under the control of fedora Infrastructure. This would be a critical thing > that needs to be open. I don't forsee any problem having 100% FOSS dependencies. We can make sure the results page works with gcj or worst case write it in another language. It's pretty trivial code wise. > Have i mentioned that this needs to be completely open and transparent. Hence the open, transparent discussion here ;-) don _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
