On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 15:58 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 01:49 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > >> Third party repository containing only Free but patent encumbered > >> software hosted outside of US in a region not affected by software > >> patents and in resources provided external to Red Hat. > > > > That definition fails. And it fails completely. If it is a Third party > > repository, you cannot control what other software is put in it. > > > > If you _can_ control what else gets put into it, then it's not really a > > Third party repo. > > third party in this case = not owned/controlled by Red Hat. > It is/will-be run by a group of trusted fedora contributors who agree to > abide by whatever rules are required. > > If that's not good enough, well, bummer. > I think that group of contributors need to not WORK for red hat either. -sv _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
