Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 01:49 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Third party repository containing only Free but patent encumbered
software hosted outside of US in a region not affected by software
patents and in resources provided external to Red Hat.
That definition fails. And it fails completely. If it is a Third party
repository, you cannot control what other software is put in it.
If you _can_ control what else gets put into it, then it's not really a
Third party repo.
third party in this case = not owned/controlled by Red Hat.
It is/will-be run by a group of trusted fedora contributors who agree to
abide by whatever rules are required.
If that's not good enough, well, bummer.
-- Rex
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
