On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 03:54:40PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:23:17 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > > [Jesse to Ralf] > > > I'm sorry you don't like my abbreviated language. The rest of us don't like > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > This --> is extremely bad form unless you are the official spokesperson > for "the rest of us". > > > your un-abbreviated extremely rude and brash attitude. > > > Yes, dep checking on the updates tree is something that is in need of work. > > It is a feature that is yet to be implemented. Care to help? > > It has been an advertised feature for a very long time. Several comments > on bodhi said it would be capable of rejecting packages with broken > deps. Turns out it can't, because it's a feature that is not > implemented. And of course, rel-eng (or whoever approves the updates) > doesn't do any checking of broken deps at all. Imagine this: A package, > which has been broken for almost half a year, has passed review and has > been pushed into stable updates. No chance even to run extras repoclosure > when updates-testing can be skipped so easily. I implemented closure checking for bodhi a while back, but a week before F7 was released, we all decided to entirely change the way we create the updates repository; thus, we have to approach this issue differently now. luke _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
