On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:23:17 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: [Jesse to Ralf] > I'm sorry you don't like my abbreviated language. The rest of us don't like ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ This --> is extremely bad form unless you are the official spokesperson for "the rest of us". > your un-abbreviated extremely rude and brash attitude. > Yes, dep checking on the updates tree is something that is in need of work. > It is a feature that is yet to be implemented. Care to help? It has been an advertised feature for a very long time. Several comments on bodhi said it would be capable of rejecting packages with broken deps. Turns out it can't, because it's a feature that is not implemented. And of course, rel-eng (or whoever approves the updates) doesn't do any checking of broken deps at all. Imagine this: A package, which has been broken for almost half a year, has passed review and has been pushed into stable updates. No chance even to run extras repoclosure when updates-testing can be skipped so easily. _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board