Ralf Corsepius wrote:
RH "dark chamber" decisions in many cases first take effect, and are
never discussed nor voted on. They are "divine", except for some rare
occasions when one or more of these "divine creatures" has the grace to
listen.
ATM, I am seeing @RH's (esp. rel-eng) drawing arguable RH-centric
decisions, which I consider to be spoiling large parts of the basis the
former FE's success was based on.
If you want things to improve you can't be throwing vague accusations.
Rel Eng has non-RH members in it and can potentially accommodate more if
they volunteer.
But that's how the board will work, 4 people get elected (community)
and 5 appointed from RH. You get the mix you mention.
Well, I must have missed this.
It has been that way right from the start and several people have told
you this in discussions before on and offlist.
Rahul
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
