I wanted to take the time to write a long response but haven't gotten to that and think that this needs at least _some_ response. On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 07:11 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 31.05.2007 18:03, Brian Pepple wrote: > > It's that time of year again. Everyone that wants to be in the next > > FESCo needs to nominate him/herself for it by June 12, 2007 0:00 UTC; > > that self-nomination should contain some information's like "Mission > > Statement, Past work summary and Future plans". > > I think it's to early to have that election; the Board (together with > FESCo) still didn't clarify what FESCo will be responsible for and where > other groups (release engineering for example) are in the hierarchy of > the whole game. That should be solved *before* a proper election is held > IMHO, as that is highly relevant. I tend to agree here... it's important for the upcoming Board election as well. And so the Board has started down the road of getting a proposal out. But LinuxTag and Fedora 7's release kind of put a speed bump in front of things there. I could definitely see an argument for delaying the election for that and probably would have said we should go later when fesco was discussing things, but I thought we'd have this out of the way by now :-/ Jeremy _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
