Re: FS/OSS license: not quite enough of a requirement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 06:50 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:

> I think that in your wiki writeup (you can do a draft under your own
> page) 

Although it doesn't (yet) exist, I set a watch on AlexandreOliva.* for
Wiki changes.  I'm interested in helping out with this.  I think a
well-written "Fedora Promise" is good for us.  As with others on this
list, it would be easiest for me to test the quality of draft by reading
it. :)

One recommendation is to get a final version together, and then have it
vetted by a lawyer.  The reason being, words have different meanings
under a legal context that we would never imagine in other contexts.
This is just basic QA.

- Karsten
-- 
   Karsten Wade, 108 Editor       ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux