On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 16:02 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > Max Spevack schrieb: > > On Tue, 1 May 2007, Karsten Wade wrote: > > > >> [2] > >> FPB > >> \=> FESCo -------------- > >> | |=> QA + > >> | |=> Testing + > >> | |=> RelEng + > >> | + > >> |=> Docs --------------+ > >> |=> Artwork -----------+ > >> |=> Ambassadors -------+ > >> |=> L10n --------------+ > >> \=> ... ---------------+ > > > > I think I prefer this second model. It allows FESCO to work on *exactly* > > what is core to the next release of the Fedora OS, and it allows some of > > the other Fedora projects to help FESCO as needed (Docs or artwork are > > great examples here) but maintain their own sort of lifecycle that isn't > > necessarily tied to a specific release of Fedora. > > +1 +1 -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Project: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PaulWFrields irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
