Max Spevack schrieb: > On Tue, 1 May 2007, Karsten Wade wrote: > >> [2] >> FPB >> \=> FESCo -------------- >> | |=> QA + >> | |=> Testing + >> | |=> RelEng + >> | + >> |=> Docs --------------+ >> |=> Artwork -----------+ >> |=> Ambassadors -------+ >> |=> L10n --------------+ >> \=> ... ---------------+ > > I think I prefer this second model. It allows FESCO to work on *exactly* > what is core to the next release of the Fedora OS, and it allows some of > the other Fedora projects to help FESCO as needed (Docs or artwork are > great examples here) but maintain their own sort of lifecycle that isn't > necessarily tied to a specific release of Fedora. +1 CU thl _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
