On Friday 13 April 2007 09:37:32 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > I can feel with you and understand your point. But that *IMHO* the > overhead you have to live with if you want to get the community > involved, as they afaics want to have a chance to influence stuff if > they spend lots of their time working on that stuff (Fedora in this case). > > But that overhead IMHO worth the trouble *if you do it right*, because > the community then will do work that you otherwise would have to do. But > if you don't do it right it can easily fail and you have some overhead, > but get nearly nothing back, or even worse, you have to continue to do > all the work. I see you've taken this as an US vs THEM stance again. It's not. The fact is there _are_ community people in the release team and as far as I've seen they're just as interested in just getting work done than spending the next 2 weeks arguing over how to structure the governance, meeting schedule, voting style, reporting officers, etc... In fact, I'd go so far as to say that everybody _but_ me in the group is a community member. I am the only person that is paid to release engineer Fedora. Everybody else participates outside their normal day job which would make them community members regardless of who their employer is. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpxWXSJ2McJB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
