On 4/11/07, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Switching just to switch is not interesting. Finding a new ideal workflow, which should include things like bug / defect management, feature tracking, distribution status, project management, etc... and building up tools around that workflow is.
Of course. Not just 'interesting', though. Well more than 'interesting'. It seems obvious to me (from my experience at Novell) that having such a workflow will be a major competitive advantage for whatever distro achieves it first and gets buyin to the workflow from major upstream providers. [And yes, despite their execution problems, Canonical has a two year head start on this. That should scare RH Corporate as much or more so than anything else Canonical is doing.] Luis _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board