Re: cross-site bug tracking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 10 April 2007 23:38:37 Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> I was against having another bugzilla on the grounds that Red Hat
> doesn't even have one full time bugzilla hacker (last time this came up.
> I don't know about now.)  If we have some community members who are
> willing to maintain and hack on a fedora bugzilla then that changes my
> take on things.  It would be great to have better bugzilla integration
> and if Fedora was part of driving development of that it would be even
> better.

I was against it because of how closely our other Red Hat products work with 
the Fedora bugs.  I think they work closely enough that even the best 
bugzilla linking software isn't going to make it as easy as things are today.  
I'm far more interested in making a custom Fedora landing page for our 
bugzilla and cleaning out all the accumulated cruft/versions/etc in our 
Fedora products, as well as clearing out all the things under Fedora that add 
to confusion.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

Attachment: pgpwfzDSA641F.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux