On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 16:53 -0400, Luke Macken wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 02:43:51PM -0400, Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote: > > You all know my thoughts on this -- but to recap: > > > > 1. Get engaged with the xmlrpc work that's going on in upstream bugzilla. > > Make sure it's good. That takes care of the transport layer. > > > > 2. Work to get OpenID support into upstream bugzilla. That takes care of > > the authentication layer. > > > > 3. Work on the web UI to implement the "send this bug to another instance > > of bugzilla". That takes care of the interface layer. > > > > That's the winning strategy, I think. The question is, who has the time > > to implement, or to oversee implementation? > > > > FWIW, I think it's pretty strategic, and a lot of these pieces are already > > happening, so it's probably a matter of someone doing a strong design > > exercise -- but my hands are full elsewhere. > > +1 > > Bugzilla hacker Max Kanat-Alexander has been offering to help us > maintain our own Bugzilla instance for a while now. Will would know > better than I, but from what I've heard there is internal resistance to > push forward with this due to the added overhead of having to deal with > yet *another* Bugzilla instance. > > If we implement what Greg mentioned above, the issue of dealing with > another Bugzilla instance essentially becomes irrelevant. I've been working on getting all of the perl bits into Fedora to support the latest Bugzilla codebase. Several of them still need a review: perl-Email-Send [234791] \ perl-Email-Abstract [234790] perl-Email-Reply [234787] \ perl-Email-MIME-Creator [234786] \\ perl-Email-Simple-Creator [234785] \\\ perl-Email-Date [234784] ~spot _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
