Hi! Max Spevack schrieb: > [...] > I want to use the hour to completely go over the main deliverables for > Fedora 7, and get a sense of where everything is from a quality and > readiness perspective. And in an effort to make sure that the Board isn't > passing judgement on topics that should be handled at a "lower" level, I'd > like to make sure that some of the other leaders of major F7 areas are > around. This is probably something a bit more for FESCo, but well, if F7 as a whole gets discussed it might be worth discussing this for two or three minutes (not more, as the merge reviews will be stopped soon after test4 until F7 anyway iirc). I noticed that there were some merge reviews comments today like this: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-review/2007-April/msg00988.html (Just look at the five or six before it by clicking on "Date Prev" -- those are similar). E.g. the reviewer gives up due to lack of replies from the Core maintainers of said packages. Should we do something about that and poke said maintainers somehow with a stick ;-) so they cooperate more when the merge reviews continue after F7? CU thl _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
