On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 10:01 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 10:51 -0400, Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, seth vidal wrote: > > > > > 2. updates-testing for all repos will help > > > > Meaning 3rd party repos? > > I continue to stand firm that its not updates-testing.repo that is > needed, but "updates testers". We can barely manage formalized QA for > Fedora (no disrespect to wwoods), how can we in good conscience impose > that on other repositories? You're right - simply imposing that on other repos is not going to solve anything for them, just like the mere presence of updates-testing does not magically solve any of our problems. But: having updates-testing *does* allow us to build a proper testing workflow for proposed updates. So we're doing that. Hopefully the other repos can follow suit and benefit from this work. So yeah, it's not the presence of the -testing repo that helps, it's the workflow you build around it. I hope that we'll lead by example rather than demand compliance. -w
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
