Luis Villa wrote:
On 3/25/07, Matt Domsch <matt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> No, that is what 3(c) is for. Only Fedora carries the long-term
> storage requirements in that case. (And as far as I can see, if you're
> still distributing FC1, Fedora has no problem with nearly indefinite
> storage.)
That's the problem. We don't have infinite and indefinite storage,
Which 'we'? Fedora? or Fedora's mirrors? I guess I assumed the primary
goal here was to reduce demands on mirrors, not on Fedora.
Fedora, right now we've got 43G free on the primary mirror. I want to
know what our options are.
-Mike
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
