On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 12:23 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 3/20/07, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 12:04 -0400, Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote: > > > On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > > > > > Instead, Fedora has a leadership system, which is widely being ignored > > > > by the public, unless it interferes with individual contributor > > > > interests. > > > > > > Isn't that basically how governments work? > > Temporarily yes. > > > > History tells, in longer terms such governments inevitably will die. In > > democratic systems, they sooner or later will be replaced, in absolutist > > systems these governments will sooner or later be chased or die > > lonesome. > > > > Is this the "pure anarchy is the only true freedom!" argument? No, this the a "government without supporters will not work" argument. A consequence from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_contract and its reflection on modern democracy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Contract_%28Rousseau%29 Ralf _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
