On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 17:03 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > Could you provide examples of this where more than just one or two vocal > > people opposed something and it was done anyway? I cannot recall such a > > time, but if there is one it would be important to use as an example to > > learn from. > Why am I not really surprised about his answer? It was a question for you. Not an answer. > A successful "strong leadership" in a system run by volunteers, implies > "leadership to provide guidance to the public" and "leadership to > achieve acceptance by the public". > > So far, this has not taken place. Instead, Fedora has a leadership > system, which is widely being ignored by the public, unless it > interferes with individual contributor interests. I'm genuinely sorry but I do not see where things are being ignored by the public. The PC makes guidelines, those are followed, etc. And I honestly cannot think of a time when either FESCo or FAB or PC make a decision that was contrary to a majority of what people wanted[1]. If you could please provide some examples of what you're referring to, then we can have a discussion about it. But just saying things like this doesn't really provide a good basis to discuss and resolve any issues. josh [1] with perhaps the exception of patented items such as MP3 where there is no legal possibility for this to be included freely. _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
