Brian Pepple schrieb: > On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 15:38 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> It's afaics like this: The Packaging Committee handles all issues around >> Packaging for both Fedora and EPEL. The EPEL-SIG can define rules about >> maintaining packages in the repo (like for example the "Package >> Maintenance And Updates policy for EPEL >> "http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies/PackageMaintenanceAndUpdates >> ), but no exceptions for "theoretical" packaging (e.g. how to write spec >> files) itself. >> Is this correct? Do you guys want something different? > Seems like a reasonable policy. Is there anyone on the Packaging > Committee that is also involved in EPEL? If not, there probably should > be. Axel Thimm is members of both groups. Spot himself is interested in EPEL afaics, too. Rex seems to be interested in EPEL a bit as well. Cu thl _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
