On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 15:38 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > It's afaics like this: The Packaging Committee handles all issues around > Packaging for both Fedora and EPEL. The EPEL-SIG can define rules about > maintaining packages in the repo (like for example the "Package > Maintenance And Updates policy for EPEL > "http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies/PackageMaintenanceAndUpdates > ), but no exceptions for "theoretical" packaging (e.g. how to write spec > files) itself. > > Is this correct? Do you guys want something different? Seems like a reasonable policy. Is there anyone on the Packaging Committee that is also involved in EPEL? If not, there probably should be. /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
