On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 06:48:15AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 15.01.2007 01:13, Axel Thimm wrote: > >You don't really need different hardware for just splitting the lists. > > You mean we could continue to use the red hat mainman? Sure, but we'd > sill would need to route all our admin requests trough red hat IS, and > it seems that has been painful sometimes in the past. That's a different story, of course, I was just referring to the technical part of. Politics, policies and resources are another matter altogether. But if the Red Hat mailman-in-person wouldn't mind to run lists with "fedoraproject.org" virtual domain it would have the benefit of running with the known availability and w/o reinventing the anti-spam-wheel again. It would also ease on Fedora's own resources in infrastructure. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpE1e3rErJdD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
