On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 01:53:22PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>> "WT" == Warren Togami <wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > [Regarding fedora-packaging] > WT> How was the signal to noise ratio on this list? > > fedora-packaging has always had a very high signal to noise ratio, > since it's used primarily for Packaging Committee discussions. If we > lose it and it becomes difficult to perform committee business due to > additional discussion on fedora-devel, there's a good chance that > someone will just set up a private list elsewhere. Many PC members > are short on time as it is. > > I believe that if you need a tag like "[packaging]" to differentiate > traffic that the packaging committee needs to follow, then you've > crammed too much stuff onto one list. I'd second keeping fedora-packaging as is. The charter is discussing about packaging, not (specific) packages. But Thorsten has a point: All packagers need to know what happens over there - same is true for some other lists, too. So I suggest to have a developer/packager "announce" list, where various boards, sigs and so on can *tersly* communicate *results*, e.g. important board/fesco decisions, packaging guidelines changes, infrastructure/buildsystem changes etc., but keep the discussions in separate lists as happens now. fedora-devel-news? But before continuing on thinking about mailing lists structure, perhaps one should wait to see what the upcoming organisational structures will look like to start mapping them to lists, or to deduce some list structure out of it. I guess the most important and communicative organs do need to keep dedicated lists for a good SNR. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpnltSO30JDp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
