Re: mailing-list reorganisation, round 3 on this list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "WT" == Warren Togami <wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

[Regarding fedora-packaging]
WT> How was the signal to noise ratio on this list?

fedora-packaging has always had a very high signal to noise ratio,
since it's used primarily for Packaging Committee discussions.  If we
lose it and it becomes difficult to perform committee business due to
additional discussion on fedora-devel, there's a good chance that
someone will just set up a private list elsewhere.  Many PC members
are short on time as it is.

I believe that if you need a tag like "[packaging]" to differentiate
traffic that the packaging committee needs to follow, then you've
crammed too much stuff onto one list.

 - J<

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux