On 1/3/07, Max Spevack <max@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I think that the Fedora messaging that I see coming from the Board-level types, as well as myself, is very honest about the realities of the Fedora-RHEL relationship. I try very hard to make sure that when we talk about Fedora, we are the least BS or corporate-speak people around. But I prefer to acknowledge those things and then talk about how we want it to change. A year ago at this time the "how we want it to change" part was all vaporware. Now it's a partial reality, more each day. Look at pungi, the livecd, the build system/fedora 7 goals. So I think we're on the right track.
The direction Fedora is heading in is about as good as can possibly be imagined right now, as far as I can see. I can't speak more highly about what you guys have done and appear to be doing there. That is the only reason I'm even bothering to be on f-a-b. I'm not so positive about the messaging; not everyone is as careful as you are, Max. And even when it is careful, it seems like it isn't getting picked up by the conventional wisdom- I'm not sure I have good advice on that last part, I'm afraid. Luis _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
