On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 10:29 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Wednesday 03 January 2007 04:45, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > Agreed. We always point people to RHEL or CentOS and I think that > > becomes more and more a problem, especially now that Legacy is dead. > > > > A Fedora LTS (two years? maybe the server parts ever three?) now and > > then (every second or third release?) from a new Fedora Legacy (needs a > > different name) would IMHO a nice solution. > > My question here is who will do the work? If you want to feed from RHEL > updates, then you're basically only going to be doing backports, no new > versions. You're also only going to be fixing bugs that are deemed worthy > through the RHEL process, which usually needs a paid customer reporting the > problem, etc, etc... They are different beasts and the work still has to be > done to build packages, push them through a QA / update process, take bugs > in, do QA, etc, etc, etc... There are also (non-trivial) differences in the package set. The Fedora universe is large... :) Jeremy _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
