On Wednesday 03 January 2007 04:45, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Agreed. We always point people to RHEL or CentOS and I think that > becomes more and more a problem, especially now that Legacy is dead. > > A Fedora LTS (two years? maybe the server parts ever three?) now and > then (every second or third release?) from a new Fedora Legacy (needs a > different name) would IMHO a nice solution. My question here is who will do the work? If you want to feed from RHEL updates, then you're basically only going to be doing backports, no new versions. You're also only going to be fixing bugs that are deemed worthy through the RHEL process, which usually needs a paid customer reporting the problem, etc, etc... They are different beasts and the work still has to be done to build packages, push them through a QA / update process, take bugs in, do QA, etc, etc, etc... -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpdALqyNSAI1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
