On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 04:14:23PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 04:10:32PM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Wednesday 20 December 2006 16:03, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > That implies KVM and lhype are working in Fedora. Which they aren't, > > > at the moment. > > > > Having just watched Jeremy boot the next LiveCD test in KVM on his rawhide > > box, I'd say its working a heck of a lot better than Xen. > > We're still boned for paravirt though, which some may argue, is > the more interesting case (given not everyone has a CPU with the right knobs). Given that those CPUs have only been available from Intel or AMD for a few *months* (~6), indeed, relatively few are in the hands of users. Not to mention the performance hit from fully-virt at this point. It'd be like announcing we were going to only produce Blu-Ray DVDs from now on. >From where can we get additional resources to help with the Xen-in-Fedora merging, or is it the case that adding more people to an already late project just makes it later? In that case, what/how can we offload Juan or whomever so they can focus? -Matt _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
