On Wednesday 20 December 2006 15:48, Jeremy Katz wrote: > > So then why is Xen completely and utterly broken on rawhide, with no hope > > on the horizon? > > To be fair, this isn't because it's not being worked on -- it's just > that it's a huge chunk of work to get it back to working. But Juan is > continuing to move forward and make progress True. However if we were waiting for Xen to work again, we'd be holding up further kernel development, for something that the Fedora userbase at large may not care about. With KVM upstream, and lhype having far more of a chance than Xen, how much does our userbase really care about Xen when there are better (or at least more accepted) replacements? (yes, I'm off into lala land here) -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpL8Y8Jo7D6q.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
