On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 01:26:51PM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > Dave Jones wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 01:20:08PM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > > > David Woodhouse wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 11:59 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > > > >> If by "We", you really mean "you", then you'd be correct. FESCo, > > > >> currently anyway, still allows kmods in limited cases. > > > > > > > > If by 'limited' we mean cases where DaveJ, Jesse and I _all_ agree that > > > > it's a good idea, I'm fine with that policy continuing in the combined > > > > Fedora :) > > > > > > Tell ya what, I'll consider giving Jesse (et-al) veto power over all > > > kmods the day > > > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/170335 > > > is fixed. deal? > > > > Given this has absolutely nothing to do with the discussion at hand, > > I'm assuming you typoed the bug number. > > No typo, I'm damn serious. So enlighten me. What does this have to do with what's being discussed ? To me it seems to be nothing other than axe-grinding. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
