Re: fedora 7 schedule (was Re: Fedora 7 planing)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 13 December 2006 20:26, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> I don't know of anything we've added that's required a new enough kernel
> to that extent between releases. I know we have stuff that won't run, say,
> 2.6.9 on FC6, but I think 2.6.17, for example, works.

Trying to deal with kmods when you have two alternative different versioned 
kernels is going to be... fun.  Even more fun than kmods themselves.  Thus 
far, Extras does allow for kmods, against my very vocal yelling, so if we're 
going to go down the path of alternative kernels it's something we need to 
consider.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

Attachment: pgpDOIpDMhw8Z.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux