Re: fedora 7 schedule (was Re: Fedora 7 planing)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 05:22:03PM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
 > On Wednesday 13 December 2006 17:06, Bill Nottingham wrote:
 > > Basically, if you want Xen, you get Xen. kmods not included.
 > >
 > > I mean, it's not like we really keep kmods up to date for rawhide
 > > anyway.
 > 
 > And what about released products?  How often are the gfs1 kmods actually not 
 > broken in FC5?  Once per month, if that?

The difference is, kernel-xen actually has users.
I don't think anyone seriously cares about GFS1.

 > Perhaps I'm not seeing what is being proposed.  The xen kernel can't languish 
 > because if we rebase the kernel, we may have to rebase userland beyond what 
 > an old kernel can handle.  Boom there goes Xen.

Good point. I don't have an answer for this.

		Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux