On Wednesday 13 December 2006 17:04, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > If we are not planning on having Fedora as a stable server, we should > not release a server variant. If we are going to do desktop and server > variants, we should put some incrementally more effort into actually > have something useful in each of these variants rather than just a > different bunch of packages and stop going back and forth on what we are > trying to do. I do agree that we should find some middle ground but I > dont we have that already with the existing plan. A server spin isn't necessarily for somebody to go out and base critical apps on the spin. It's a way of composing the distro that might make sense for somebody doing server like tasks, and looking at Fedora as a precursor to the next RHEL. And see Bill's email that just came in (: -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpj0aleEQODn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
