Rahul Sundaram schrieb: > The current proposal > (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraSummit/ReleaseProcess) of changing > the Fedora lifecycle to support release N until N+2 is releases or > approximately 13+ months is pretty good but I am wondering if we can go > a bit further. My suggestion would be look at a differentiated life > cyle between Fedora server and desktop variants in the upcoming release > or have a policy as follows > > First six months - Feature additions, bug and security fixes six months > Next six months - Only bug and security fixes > Next six months - Only critical security fixes* My vote: For all releases with even number: First six months - Feature additions, bug and security fixes next six months - Only bug and security fixes next twelve months - Only critical security fixes EOL For all releases with uneven number: First six months - Feature additions, bug and security fixes next seven months - Only bug and security fixes EOL Such a theme would be helpful for users from hosting companies that run FC on their machines. Other variants (support only each third release for longer periods; support the releases with uneven numbers only for 7 month in general, ... ) are thinkable, too. CU thl _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
