On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 10:03:36PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > > The current proposal > (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraSummit/ReleaseProcess) of changing > the Fedora lifecycle to support release N until N+2 is releases or > approximately 13+ months is pretty good but I am wondering if we can go > a bit further. My suggestion would be look at a differentiated life > cyle between Fedora server and desktop variants in the upcoming release > or have a policy as follows > > First six months - Feature additions, bug and security fixes six months > Next six months - Only bug and security fixes > Next six months - Only critical security fixes* regardless of how clear you state this policy, you'll still get people filing non-security bugs in the last six months. Even processing those incoming bugs takes time, and WONTFIX'ing those leaves people just as jaded as telling them "Upgrade to FCn+1". Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
