Jesse Keating (jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > On Tuesday 21 November 2006 10:53, you wrote: > > + * Issue tracking (is bz OK?) > > So the reason I don't think bz is OK is that if we continue to use our BZ for > new projects the Product list will get quite large quite fast. Users trying > to use bugzilla.redhat.com to file bugs against say Fedora or RHEL will be > hit with a very large product list to choose from, and even more confusing if > they're filing a bug against a package that exists in one of these products, > but the package's upstream bugs are hosted on our bugzilla, the bug may get > filed upstream but we'd never know "downstream" about it. Why not 'Fedora Hosted Projects' -> component, much like gnome.org? Alternatively, a single upstream BZ for all hosted projects. Bill _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
