While looking of this again I noticed a detail that confused me slightly: Karsten Wade schrieb: > On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 12:52 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: >> On Friday 03 November 2006 12:40, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >>> Late march only once. I asked after FC5 on fedora-devel if we would >>> stick to "late march and late September" in the future again (+ some >>> delays if needed) and the answer was "no". >>> >>> But if we get our release to "round about late march and late September" >>> in the future I'd be very glad. >> It's something we shoot for, but flexibility is necessary for what we do. > Looking at the trending from Thorsten's list: > FC1 -- 5 November 2003 - General Availability > FC2 -- 18 May 2004 - General Availability > FC3 -- 8 November 2004 - General Availability > FC4 -- 13 June 2005 - General Availability > FC5 -- 20 March 2006 - General Availability > FC6 -- 24 October 2006 - General Availability > > The nine months for FC5 brought the schedule back into the > late-March/late-October flow again. [...] Why do you (and Jesse once in this thread, too) refer to "late-March/late-October"? That should be "late-March/late-September" (GNOME releases mid-March and mid-September) or "late-April/late-October" afaics (or something in between). Note, there are seven months between March and October, but only five between October and March... CU thl _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
