Re: looking at our surrent state a bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 03 November 2006 18:16, Karsten Wade wrote:
> The nine months for FC5 brought the schedule back into the
> late-March/late-October flow again.  If this is important, I think we
> all have some possibility of influencing that this stays this way; and I
> think some influence may already be applied.  What I see Thorsten saying
> is, let's keep applying that influence from the community and from Red
> Hat to keep aligned with i) a schedule that others can predict more than
> five months in advance, and ii) a schedule lined up with at least one
> major component (GNOME).  
>
> Seems reasonable to me.  We can do that _and_ remain flexible -- it's
> better to make up your mind and change it later than to never make it up
> at all ... or make it up and refuse to budge from a bad decision. ;-D

I don't want to make any assumptions about the release dates for the next 
Fedora release until after our "summit".

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

Attachment: pgpflAo3jUyNJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux