On Sat, 2006-11-04 at 01:00 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Sat, 2006-11-04 at 00:02 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > >> > >>> Normally they are quiet most of the time. But they raise their voice if > >>> they think that's needed or if it's an area where they are working. That > >>> works quite well. > >> I read FESCo meeting mins everytime and I dont see many non FESCo > >> members actively participating or commenting in between meetings. > > > > I call BS. I can think of a few offhand without even trying. It > > doesn't happen every meeting, but it does happen. Chris Weyl, Jesse > > Keating, even me before I became part of FESCo. We _do_ let non-FESCo > > people participate whenever they'd like. > > This wasnt about what was allowed but what happens in a regular fashion. > People who are willing to participate in the list are much more than > those sitting on the same channel at meeting time due to time zone > differences, work time conflicts etc and hence list is always going to > be better for a broader discussion. Since the board meetings mins are > always published, anyone can discuss things after the meeting. I dont > see why that wouldnt work. > > > I don't buy it. The only time I would think such a private discussion > > would be required are if legal matters are being discussed. > > Far from true. FESCo private lists wouldnt exist if that's the case. As far as I'm concerned, FESCo list can go at any time. josh _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
