Jesse Keating schrieb: > On Friday 03 November 2006 11:11, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> I think we should plan a bit more into the future here (e.g. have some >> rough goals for FC7 when FC6T3 [feature freeze] or FC6 get shipped or >> shortly afterwards). > Honestly (IMHO) that's a horrible time to start planning. For Ubuntu it seems fine: They started gathering ideas right away when they released 6.10 > A) it takes focus off the release we're trying to get out the door, Well, I assume at lest some packagers will have their packages in a good shape already by FCxT3. Those could work on FC(x+1) internally already. > and drowns > out already noisy mailing lists that we're trying to gather test feedback > with threads-o-doom about what joe user wants to see in the next release, and > why bob user thinks the bike shed should be brown. Well, we have different lists for it, but don't enforce that. We should IMHO. > B) nothing can be shown for the plan for a good long while as rawhide can't > start taking these new plans We could start opening up rawhide a bit earlier (e.g. when the final FCx was build). But yes, I agree here round about. > C) folks doing the planning are usually pretty frazzled trying to get Test3 > out and then cleaning up for the final Agreed. That's btw one of the reasons why I started this thread: We IMHO need more of those folks "doing the planning and finishing the release". Cu thl _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
