Jesse Keating schrieb: > On Friday 03 November 2006 06:07, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > [...] >> We still have no "Fedora Core steering Commitee" (see also >> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2006-September/msg000 >> 79.html ) -- what core does or how decisions are made it completely in the >> dark for the Community and that really sucks. > We're working on that. Core has mostly be handled by members of the Fedora > board. We'd like to change how this works for the next Fedora release. thx. >> Why don't we have a public roadmap? That might give community members >> at least a chance to get interested in topics and start helping getting >> them done. > We don't have a public road map as we haven't fully looked at all the changes > we'd like to do for the next Fedora release. I think we should plan a bit more into the future here (e.g. have some rough goals for FC7 when FC6T3 [feature freeze] or FC6 get shipped or shortly afterwards). > We just got FC6 out the door, > and we're taking a bit of a breather. Well, that's okay. I needed one myself. > New package versions continue to march > on as always. Sure. > [...] >> * we can't do anything we'd like to do; I hope we can get a bit more >> support from RH in the future > That's a pretty vague and hurtful statement :/ I went a bit more into detail in another mail. Sorry, I should have done this in the initial mail. > [...] Cu thl _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
