Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
I'm not saying we need it now. But a good solution for it might be "We'll ship FF 2.0 as a update for FC6 when it's a bit more matured and most extensions are ported; so at the end of the year probably. Until then you can get it in this special FC-6 add-on repo located on ours servers at ...."
This is already there. For detailed information http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Firefox2
That's a excuse I hear to often these days (see gutenprint for example). That why I'd like to see a Fedora Core Steering Commitee that jumps in now and then.
In the case of AIGLX that wouldnt change anything. AIGLX status as a experimental add on repository means that it is not a priority.
No. FC4 shipped with Gnome 2.10. 2.12 was never shipped by FC. 2.14 was in FC5. That 2.12 never was shipped in FC really sucked.
As I said earlier, putting major updates like this post release is a QA nightmare and should be avoided.
Personally I want to see a more formal update policy
There is a draft in the wiki that was included in the board update on Xorg 7.1
Rahul _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
